The disconnect
16 07 2008Last week I read Laura’s post and started to leave a comment and basically hi-jacked the post, so I decided to instead write a post of my own, and expand on it a little.
I recently had another interaction with an adoptive family that gave me pause….
it seems like there is a disconnect between adopted child” “bio child” and just “child”
This family, also met at a park, was talking about their son who had been adopted from Korea. He has been home for 20 months or so. They were sharing with me their experience of having early intervention come into their home to help with their son’s speech delays. I was talking about how every once in a while, I feel like we should have some sort of evaluation for Khai, just because, but then I realize that I don’t really think he has any issues(as far as occupational/physical/speech delays). He is somewhat slower in speech than my other two, but he walked at about a month before either one of them did….
Anyhow, she burst out with,”well, since we brought him into our family, we need to give him all the opportunities that we would give our other(bio) children.”
And it made me really uncomfortable. To say that just seems like having to put words to the obvious. Having to justify something that needs no justification.
I think that for me, and many of my on-line buddies “adopted child” and “bio child” are necessary terms that describe how our children came into our families. Many times both terms carry with them complex situations, on-going need for evaluation, thoughts that, for our Vietnamese a-kids, include the climate of Vietnamese adoptions at the time of their adoption. These terms describe where/how children come to our family. The terms bring along with them many assumptions, some true, some not.
What these terms do not describe is our relationship to/with our children. We do not continue to relate to our child as “our adopted child” and in my case “my bio kids”. Of course Khai’s being adopted brings in many many issues/concerns/joys/opportunities that I do not have with my bio kids and vice versa- but those thing do not define my relationship with my bio kids or with Khai. They are a part of it, but not all of it.
If I continue to define my relationship with Khai based on how he came into my family, I will have a disconnect in my mind/heart when it comes to relating with him.
While this is where I am at now, I feel obligated to say that I started this journey at a MUCH different place. I DID believe I was “saving a baby”. I believed that I was part of the solution to the worldwide problem of fatherless/motherless children. Ah, life.
There has been MUCH that has changed my perspective over the past 4 years, some of it personal tradegy, but a lot of my change in thinking has come through education; specifically through blogging. I still remember the first post I read of my bloggy friend over 2 years ago now. I started reading Mrs. Broccoli Guy because she had a catchy name and I found her blog from either Nicki or Kelly because I “met” Kelly & Nicki on the boards. Met may not be the right term for lurking and reading other people’s posts….
The part no one wants to talk about was one of the first posts that really articulated for me some of the fears/concerns that were floating around in my head, but that I couldn’t quite put my finger on. While we were searching for an agency, we knew enough to look for an agency that had a posture of finding families for children, not the other way around. But that was about it.
When I started to realize 3-4 years ago just how much corruption there was in the world of international adoption, my perspective began to change. This past winter when the report came out from the embassy about corruption, it really put things into a clear focus for me. It is impossible to continue in any sort of messiah complex about adoption when you very well could have contributed to the reason there are so many children that need homes.
When we pull back our focus slightly, we realize that if adoption is about “saving babies”, it is at best a very ineffective way to go about it. When we look at the problems in the world that cause familes to be unable to raise their children, we have to admit, at least in part, that we, as Americans/westerners have some responsibility by simply living in our culture and participating in many of the advantages that come at the cost of people living half-way around the world. Before I get beat up for being a hypocrite or anti-American, OR anti-adoption, my point is only to say that adoption is not and cannot be about saving babies. It is not an act of charity. I believe that having children is a selfish desire, however they come into your family. Raising children, on the other hand, is a daily exercise in selflessness.
As a Christian, I believe that I am called to care for the orphan, widow and fatherless. This is made clear through out both the Old and New Testament. The Bible also makes clear that adoption is a valid way to build families, and that it is in fact ordained by God(God’s own son was adopted by Joseph) just as having bio kids is. Where I think as Christians we can go wrong is when we combine the two.
The disconnect comes when people, whether other a-parents or just the general public, view children who were adopted as recipients of charity. Those of us who have been forced to be honest with ourselves and the world around realize not only how false this assumption is, but dangerous to us AND our children.
Comments : 5 Comments »
Categories : Adoption Issues, Parenting Issues, Uncategorized



Recent Comments